OurResearch receives $7.5M grant from Arcadia to establish OpenAlex, a milestone development for Open Science

OurResearch is proud to announce a $7.5M grant from Arcadia, to establish a sustainable and completely open index of the world’s research ecosystem. With this 5-year grant, OurResearch expands their open science ambitions to replace paywalled knowledge graphs with OpenAlex.

Researchers, funders, and organizations around the world rely on scientific knowledge graphs to find, perform, and manage their research. For decades, only paywalled proprietary systems have provided this information and they have become unaffordable (costing libraries $1B annually); uninclusive (systematically excluding works from some fields and geographies); and unavailable (even paid subscribers are limited in their use of the data).

OpenAlex indexes more than twice as many scholarly works as the leading proprietary products and the entirety of the knowledge graph and its source code are openly licensed and freely available through data snapshots, an easy to use API, and a nascent user interface.

OurResearch has a decade of sustained experience developing tools that advance open science. Funds from Arcadia will fuel the development needed to establish OpenAlex as the go-to scientific knowledge graph for researchers and organizations around the world. Long-term sustainability of OpenAlex will be achieved through value-add premium services.

Development of OpenAlex started only two years ago and it already serves 115M API calls per month; underlies a major university ranking; is displacing proprietary products at Universities; and has established partnerships with national governments. We are excited by these early successes of OpenAlex and its promise to revolutionize scholarly communication and democratize the world’s research.

— — — — 

OurResearch is a nonprofit that builds tools to help accelerate the transition to universal Open Science. Started at a hackathon in 2011, they remain committed to creating open, sustainable research infrastructure that solves real-world problems, like Unpaywall and Unsub.

Arcadia is a charitable foundation that works to protect nature, preserve cultural heritage and promote open access to knowledge. Since 2002 Arcadia has awarded more than $1 billion to organizations around the world.

Coverage in the Financial Times of OpenAlex and the Sorbonne

The Financial Times recently published an article detailing Sorbonne University’s “radical decision” to switch to OpenAlex for its publication database and bibliometric analytics. The article (behind a paywall, unfortunately 😞) came out a little while ago, but we wanted to highlight it here in case you missed it.

The news comes in the context of “a wider pushback against the current model in academic publishing, where researchers publish and review papers for free but have to buy expensive subscriptions to the journals in which they are published to analyse data relating to their work.” It includes a quote from OurResearch/OpenAlex co-founder and CEO Jason Priem: “We felt there’s a mismatch between the values of the academy and the shareholder boardroom. Research is fundamentally about sharing, while for-profits are fundamentally about capturing and enclosing. We aim to create and sustain research infrastructure that’s truly aligned with . . . the values of the research community.”

Exciting times for OpenAlex and open science!

Jack, Andrew. “Sorbonne’s Embrace of Free Research Platform Shakes up Academic Publishing.” Financial Times, December 27, 2023. https://www.ft.com/content/89098b25-78af-4539-ba24-c770cf9ec7c3.

Sorbonne University announces switch to OpenAlex

We at OpenAlex are thrilled at Sorbonne University’s recent announcement that they will be switching to OpenAlex for their publication database and bibliometric analytics, abandoning the use of proprietary products! The Sorbonne, a leading French university, made their announcement in a recent post (click here for the English version; click here for the French version). Starting in 2024, they will be ending their subscription to Web of Science and Clarivate’s bibliometric tools. They will instead be adopting “open, free and participatory tools, and [they are] now working on the consolidation of a sustainable and international alternative, relying in particular on the OpenAlex tool.”

OpenAlex has been working closely with the Sorbonne to make this switch possible, and as they note, “A partnership agreement will shortly be established between Sorbonne University and OpenAlex to formalize their contributions and mutual commitments … and to bring about developments that will meet the needs of its community.” This is an extremely exciting milestone for us and for open science! We invite you all to celebrate with us 🎉🎉🎉!

Assigning Institutions — New England Journal of Medicine Case Study

The New England Journal of Medicine uses a non-standard format when presenting authors and their institutional affiliations, which is a problem when we want to keep track of these links in our data. We developed a custom algorithm to solve this problem, preserving more than a hundred thousand author-institution links.

Linking works, authors, and institutions

Part of a diagram from the OpenAlex docs, showing how authors and institutions are linked to works through authorships.
OpenAlex data has links between works, authors, and institutions.

Works, authors, and institutions are three of the basic entities in the OpenAlex data. Keeping track of the relationships between these entities is one of the core things we do. It’s important that we identify these links correctly, so they can be used for downstream tasks like university research intelligence, ranking, etc. Often, this information comes to us via structured data which is not difficult to ingest. Many times, however, the data is messy, and using it is not so straightforward.

Affiliation data in the New England Journal of Medicine

Publications from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) are an example of this messiness. Author affiliations in these papers are presented in a format that is human-readable, but not straightforward for a computer to parse automatically. In most other journals, authors are listed alongside their affiliated institutions, and so it is relatively easy for a program to link them together. NEJM does it a different way—as shown in the screenshot of a paper from the journal’s website, institutions are listed together with the initials of the authors, which in turn correspond to the full author names at the top of the paper.

Screenshot of the affiliations of a paper from the New England Journal of Medicine's website.
Author affiliations in NEJM come in a nonstandard format that is not easy for a computer to parse.

We might hope that the structured metadata we get from Crossref would have the data in a more standard format. But alas, this isn’t the case, as shown in the screenshot of data from the Crossref API.

Screenshot of JSON data from the Crossref API
Data about the paper from the Crossref API is also in the nonstandard format.

There are around 170,000 works from this journal. This is a relatively tiny proportion of the total number of works in OpenAlex. However, NEJM is a highly influential journal in medicine, so it’s a priority that we get this right.

Custom OpenAlex solution to assign institutions to NEJM authors

OpenAlex team member Nolan created a bespoke algorithm specifically for NEJM papers to parse the affiliation strings and assign authors to institutions. This rule-based algorithm identifies the author initials that might correspond to the full names, and uses those as a mapping to get the link from institution to author, as shown in the screenshot from the OpenAlex API of the example paper from above. The full data for this work can be found at https://api.openalex.org/works/W4386208393.

We have been able to apply this to around 35,000 articles, amounting to 158,000 institutional affiliations. Additionally, we identified about ten thousand raw affiliation strings that we couldn’t match to an institution, but can still prove useful to our users.

The NEJM case is an example of the attention to data and extra effort that is part of the value that OpenAlex hopes to provide. The data can be messy sometimes. It’s our mission to help make sense of it, so the world can have access to high-quality, free and open data.

Screenshot of JSON data from the OpenAlex API
OpenAlex data has institutional affiliations as structured, fully linked data.

New study shows OpenAlex is a good alternative to Scopus for demographic research

Highlights

  • New research from the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research analyzes global migration of scholars, using bibliometric data. They do a side-by-side comparison of this analysis between Scopus and OpenAlex data.
  • Counts of scholars by country are highly correlated between Scopus and OpenAlex.
  • Migration events are less correlated between the two, but trends in migration between top pairs of countries are consistent between them. There is higher correlation with Western countries, and OpenAlex has more coverage of non-Western countries.
  • OpenAlex is open. Scopus is not. This puts limits on how researchers can perform and share this type of analysis.

A new working paper[1] from researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR) uses bibliometric data to study the migration patterns of scholars between countries. Within the field of demography, there is a lack of high-quality data about human migration; so this use of scholarly publication data to infer global-scale migration of scholars is a welcome contribution. They compare the use of two sources of large-scale bibliometric data: “Elsevier’s proprietary Scopus and the openly available OpenAlex.”

The findings of the paper suggest that OpenAlex is a source of open data that shows promise as a replacement for the more established—but more restricted—Scopus data. Overall counts of scholars between countries over time have a high correlation between Scopus and OpenAlex, “with a median correlation close to 1.” The analysis of migration events between the two databases shows less correlation overall, but among the top pairs of countries, “the bilateral flows … are consistent in the two databases.” The authors go on to discuss the reason for the differences, noting that “[this] could signal a large difference in coverage of individual migration trajectories between these two databases and can also stem from the small net migration rates which fluctuate with small differences in measurement rather than population counts which are larger and small changes do not cause them to fluctuate.” In other words, while smaller scale trends may present differently between different data sources due to the nuances and idiosyncrasies of each one, the larger-scale trends are consistent.

The results also suggest that, in some cases, OpenAlex may be an even better resource than Scopus for this analysis. The authors note that the magnitude of migration flows is much larger in OpenAlex compared to Scopus, and that “this could indicate that the higher coverage of publications in OpenAlex might help discover some under-explored scholarly migration corridors worldwide.”

The paper does note some limitations of using OpenAlex as opposed to Scopus for their purposes, specifically, “the quality of the author name disambiguation and identifiers in OpenAlex needs further evaluation in future research.” Evaluating the job that OpenAlex has done assigning authors to all of their papers was outside the scope of this research, but they are able to refer to established research validating the Scopus data. We look forward to this validation on the OpenAlex data both from us and from other independent researchers. We’re also happy to say that we are continually making improvements in our author name disambiguation, so our data will be getting better and better!

Finally, there is the big difference between the two services: OpenAlex is open, while Scopus is not. The authors touch on this several times throughout the paper, both directly and indirectly. They mention that they must limit the years of their analysis, due to “our license terms for Scopus data”. In their Methods section, they describe the multiple steps they had to take to gain access to and acquire the Scopus data, while for OpenAlex, the process was much simpler: “we obtain the publicly available data and process it ourselves”. And in the Acknowledgements section, they explain that the Scopus license terms only permit sharing aggregated results, and no individual data is shared.

Overall, we are very proud that OpenAlex is being recognized as an emerging high-quality, completely open source of bibliometric data that can be used for demographic research. The lack of restrictions on our data is extremely important as it eliminates barriers that researchers face in doing their work. Please check out their paper to learn more about their work!


[1] Akbaritabar, A., Theile, T. & Zagheni, E. Global flows and rates of international migration of scholars. WP-2023-018 https://www.demogr.mpg.de/en/publications_databases_6118/publications_1904/mpidr_working_papers/global_flows_and_rates_of_international_migration_of_scholars_7729 (2023) doi:10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2023-018.

How you can help keep OpenAlex free

Next month, we’re submitting a renewal application for our main grant. This grant helps keep OpenAlex free to you. We need your help to get the renewal. There are two ways to help:

  1. Write a short testimonial 
  2. Subscribe to our Premium service

Details below:

1. Testimonial

We need to show our funder that we’re making a real and necessary impact. Testimonials are amazing for that. Could you write us a quick testimonial? We need 5-7 sentences that answer these questions:

  • Who are you?
  • What problem is OpenAlex solving for you?
  • How did you solve it before us?
  • Why is OpenAlex a better solution?
  • What’s a concrete good outcome of using OpenAlex?
  • Would you recommend OpenAlex to others?

Here’s an (imaginary) example:

CatCademia connects academic researchers to share research ideas and cat pictures. For this we need publication lists for all users. Originally, users had to curate their own lists, which was a big pain point. Now we use OpenAlex’s open API to auto-generate users’ publication lists at signup. Upon launching this feature, we saw an immediate increase in user retention and cat-picture sharing. We highly recommend OpenAlex to anyone who needs high-quality, open scholarly data.

You can submit your testimonial here. Thanks!

2. Premium

We recently launched a paid upgrade to our service called OpenAlex Premium. Premium offers:

  • Faster updates, so you can get fresher data,
  • Higher API limits, so you can use the API more, and
  • Priority support for faster and more detailed help.

Our funder (correctly, imho) wants to see we’re on the road to self-sustainability. So, we’re asking you to take a look at Premium and see if it’s something that would help you. 

If not, no worries–we’re delighted to make most of what we do free, and we want users to enjoy that. But if it looks useful, please get in touch ASAP! We’re offering hefty early-adopter discounts to folks that sign up this month.

Thanks very much for your time and support!

Best,

The OpenAlex Team

Introducing Jason Portenoy, newest full-time team member at OpenAlex

Photo of Jason Portenoy

Hi, I’m Jason Portenoy, and I’m very happy to be joining OurResearch as the newest full-time team member! As a data engineer, I will be focusing my efforts on user engagement and outreach for OpenAlex. It is my responsibility to understand the OpenAlex dataset—its strengths and limitations—and work with the user community to improve it and make it easier to use.

I completed my PhD in Information Science at the University of Washington, studying the use of the scholarly literature as data to curate, explore, and evaluate scientific research. This field—known by various terms including scientometrics, science of science, metascience, and Big Scholarly Data—captivated me from the moment I learned about it. As the scale of scientific output continues to increase well beyond the capacity of any individual to make sense of it, the need for new tools and techniques to help becomes more and more pronounced. Working with Dr. Jevin West at the UW Datalab, I developed these tools and techniques—analyzing and visualizing scholarly data, and building recommender systems to connect scientists to new research and ideas. I extended this work through projects with Semantic Scholar, the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative, and JSTOR.

Nautilus visualization showing scholarly impact (J. Portenoy)

While working on these tools and analyses, I came to rely on several scholarly data sets, such as Web of Science and Microsoft Academic Graph. Through my experience, I became an advocate for having high-quality, open, and accessible data for researchers and builders to use. A solid foundation of quality data will strengthen all downstream applications, from simple counts and bibliometric statistics, to advanced natural language processing and complex systems approaches.

Joining the OpenAlex team is a fantastic opportunity for me to contribute to the future of scholarly data. When Microsoft decided to end its academic service, myself and many others in the community wondered what would come next. It has become clear that OpenAlex will play a key role in the future of this field. I come to this position with technical training as a data engineer and data scientist, as well as experience with scholarly data. My goal is to work with the community of users to continually improve the OpenAlex data and experience. If there’s anything you think I might be able to help with, please let us know!

OpenAlex documentation improvements

It’s a new year and at OurResearch we’re starting off 2023 full steam ahead! We’ve revamped the OpenAlex documentation so that it’s easier to get started, and easier to find the fields and filters that are available in the OpenAlex API. It should take less “clicks” to find what you need.

Poised for growth

The major change we made was to highlight the core entities (works, authors, etc) in OpenAlex, giving them their own up-front space. OpenAlex grew considerably in 2022, not only in number records, but also by the number of ways that you can filter, group, and search scholarly data. This new approach provides more room to add and document filters. We can better describe the unique search capabilities available in each entity. Overall, it sets us up to grow again in 2023.

Our goal is to maintain friendly and approachable documentation, so hopefully we’ve kept that up as well. If you find something broken, or have some suggested improvements, let us know!

Author search in OpenAlex: improved handling of diacritics within names

We’ve improved the author search feature within OpenAlex, so you get more results when searching for author names that may or may not include diacritics. For example, a search for the name “David Tarragó” will return the same number of results as the the version that is converted via Lucene’s ASCII folding filter, which in this case is “David Tarrago”.

When searching with diacritics, results with the queried diacritics are more likely to be ranked towards the top. So the two searches may have slightly different rankings. You can see the results of these two searches in the API:

These queries return the same number of results, with diacritic and non-diacritic names included. Keep in mind that results are weighted by the author’s works count, so that has an impact on relevance as well.

Why make this change?

When creating the OpenAlex author search capability, it was important for us to honor author’s names by respecting diacritics. So searching with a diacritic returned results with diacritics. However, this strict approach makes it harder to find some authors. We’re comfortable with the compromise of searching with and without diacritics at the same time, while giving priority to the intended search query. Hopefully this improved feature is helpful!

Fetch multiple DOIs in one OpenAlex API request

Did you know that you can request up to 50 DOIs in a single API call? That’s possible due to the OR query in the OpenAlex API and looks like this:

https://api.openalex.org/works?filter=doi:10.3322/caac.21660|https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71|10.3322/caac.21654&mailto=support@openalex.org

We simply separate our DOIs with the pipe symbol ‘|’. That query will return three works associated with the three DOIs we entered. As you can see in the query, a short form DOI or long form DOI (as a URL) are both supported.

This will save time and resources when requesting many DOIs. This technique works with all IDs in OpenAlex, to include OpenAlex IDs and PubMed Central IDs (PMID).

Example with python requests

Let’s write an example python script to show how we can get DOIs in batches of 50 using requests:

import requests

dois = ["10.3322/caac.21660", "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71", "10.3322/caac.21654"]
pipe_separated_dois = "|".join(dois)
r = requests.get(f"https://api.openalex.org/works?filter=doi:{pipe_separated_dois}&per-page=50&mailto=support@openalex.org")
works = r.json()["results"]

for work in works:
  print(work["doi"], work["display_name"])

# results
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654 Cancer Statistics, 2021

Hope this is helpful!